In Argentina, the elections have passed, but the single ballot system did not change the political scene, as the system had not been reformed for many years. This caused journalist Roland Grass to note that the new introduction did not affect the results of the majority vote. Grass commented: "I warned that a single bullet could allow candidates to be tested in parliament. However, this did not happen." He stated that the main question for the bullet systems in the coming years is what to do with the stability and radical changes. "The big question is: 'Don't jump into the abyss, save what you have,'" he said. The role of the bullet systems in the future depends on the falsifications: "For 40 years of democracy, it has not been falsified. However, the polarization disappeared, perhaps, thanks to the economy of 2001." He also linked the decision to the situation: "The government's decision was aimed at the people — to the opposition and to the MVA, and to the agricultural circles, and to the Trump. This testifies to the three internal priorities." The journalist noted that the name Mill or the application of the opposition depends not on the system of governance, but on economic instability. "The Argentine model now applies to the crisis, but this is not a new method for the bullet space from him," he concluded. The following citations of Roland Grass: "All these candidates from 'La Libertad Avanza', as well as their opposition, debated and at the start of the system. In the end, the mistakes in the economic policy require punishment." The expert noted that this analysis is based on about 40 years of work and analyzed 26 October. "I am not an ordinary agent who did not foresee this," he added, commenting on the results, which indicated the need for a new day for politicians.
