Columnist Pablo Sirvén analyzed the growing confrontation between the Government and the press, warning about the risks involved when the President himself leads the attack. According to Sirvén, this assault relates to practices of authoritarian regimes present in Argentine history, from Perón to Cristina Kirchner, and now Milei.
Sirvén emphasized that the attacks used to be sporadic and vague, until the presidential discourse became more aggressive and direct towards journalism. This attitude generates an ambiguous message that can incite violent behaviors. A recent survey revealed that 81% of society considers political journalism to be little credible, which would explain both the political silence and the leeway the Government feels to attack the press.
The analyst underscored concern about the lack of reaction to the violation of rights, especially in a context where attacks on journalism become more systematic. Sirvén noted that Milei's presence at the forefront of this offensive represents a greater level of danger, as it involves the President himself in the confrontation with the press.
Regarding the role of journalism, Sirvén admitted that, like any profession, there are things to review and improve. He highlighted the importance of not falling into a logic of confrontation that hinders constructive public dialogue, as in a polarized environment no one benefits.
