The president of Argentina, Javier Milei, declared in the Palacio Libertad that the national public university actually only benefits the children of the upper and upper-middle classes, in a country where the majority of children are poor and lack basic skills. The myth of free university education was questioned, stating that it ultimately serves as a subsidy from the poor to the rich who have the resources to study.
Milei pointed out that despite the massive entry into universities, few manage to complete their degrees on time. He insisted that universities do not fulfill their function of promoting upward social mobility, highlighting that most graduates come from families with the resources, culture, and time necessary to study.
The effectiveness of the university as a driver of social advancement was questioned under the current conditions of the country. It was suggested that the noble vocation is overshadowed by economic and political interests, which can fuel student disorders. The government proposed external audits for universities in order to ensure transparency in the use of public resources allocated.
It was mentioned that less than 40% of university students come from lower-income sectors, demonstrating inequality in access to higher education. The current university crisis was compared to past events, highlighting the complexity of the Argentine educational system.
It was emphasized that the low quality of primary and secondary education affects universities and the credibility of graduating professionals. It was suggested that education and knowledge require effort and sacrifice, and that demanding more funding for the few privileged who complete a university degree will not solve the root problems.
