Lawyer Ana Rosenfeld has once again thrown herself into the legal conflict between Wanda Nara and Mauro Icardi, asserting that the economic claim against the footballer represents a 'marginal' figure when compared to the usual standards set by the judiciary. In an interview with Radio Rivadavia, accessible to Agencia Noticias Argentinas, Rosenfeld stated that '3% of Icardi's income is not comparable to what judges usually grant, which is 20 or 30%'. In this sense, the lawyer emphasized that the percentage claimed from the forward is, in her view, notably lower than the amounts usually established in this type of case, thus seeking to defuse criticism over the magnitude of the request. Furthermore, Rosenfeld also flatly rejected any suspicion of supposed personal ties with the judge handling the case. She also lashed out at Lara Piro, a member of Icardi's defense, after it became known that a fine of 50,000 pesos had been issued for the minors' school absenteeism. ' applauding that kids don't go to school is a horrible message,' she was adamant on that point.
Rosenfeld Calls Nara's Claim Against Icardi Marginal
Ana Rosenfeld stated that the 3% of Mauro Icardi's income demanded by Wanda Nara is significantly lower than the standard 20-30% usually awarded by courts in similar cases. She also rejected suspicions of personal ties with the judge.